363 Law Professors Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiff

April 3, 2025

Share this page

Key Excerpts

  • Targeting Perkins Coie for representing clients and espousing views the President dislikes is viewpoint discrimination, plain and simple.
  • The Executive branch has no constitutional authority to use executive orders as a cudgel to beat the American legal system into submission.
  • The challenged Order names only one law firm, but in so doing, it dangles a Sword of Damocles over all those who refuse to place loyalty to the President above the interests of their clients and the law. It seeks to destroy a functional bar that ensures the government follows the law, substituting instead a bar that is, at best, reluctant to challenge the government, and, at worst, one that is a plaything of the party in power.

Read the filing
Read the filing

Other filings

April 2, 2025

Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts

March 11, 2025

Declaration of Professor Roy D. Simon, Jr. in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order