Expert Report of J. William Leonard

April 2, 2025

Share this page

Key Excerpts

  • [T]he [security clearance] process is always based upon the personal conduct of the relevant individual. That is one of the fundamental hallmarks of the security-clearance review process; Person A is never held accountable for the conduct of Person B, let alone are Persons 1 through 2,500 held accountable for the conduct of formerly-associated Person 2,501.
  • Simply put, a blanket suspension of all security clearances at a law firm of 1,200+ lawyers and 1,200+ business professionals is unprecedented in its scope and fundamentally inconsistent with existing authority addressing the processing, granting and revocation of security clearances.
  • The arbitrary directive of immediate suspension of security clearances not for any personal conduct by any clearance holder but rather simply for that individual’s association with a law firm is no different analytically than if a directive were issued to immediately suspend the security clearances of all Jews or Muslims, all members of the LGBTQ+ community, all women, or all registered Democrats or Republicans. These types of non-individualized, mass suspensions of security clearances targeted at groups of individuals threaten to harm our national security efforts.
Read the filing
Read the filing

Other filings

April 2, 2025

Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts

March 11, 2025

Declaration of Professor Roy D. Simon, Jr. in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order