Expert Report of Professor Bruce A. Green

April 2, 2025

Share this page

Key Excerpts

  • [U]njustified restrictions should not be imposed on “the freedom of clients to choose a lawyer.” D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5.6, cmt. [1].
  • The Executive Order will interfere with th[e] fundamental obligation of lawyers [to provide effective assistance of counsel] because it will chill Perkins Coie and other law firms from representing clients zealously and diligently, for fear of being branded pariahs by the federal government.
  • Whenever matters might come to the President’s attention, the Executive Order creates a conflict between the client’s lawful interests and the lawyers’ self-interest in avoiding offense to the President lest the federal government take measures to destroy their law practices.
Read the filing
Read the filing

Other filings

April 2, 2025

Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts

March 11, 2025

Declaration of Professor Roy D. Simon, Jr. in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order