Opinion and Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Judge Beryl Howell

March 26, 2025

Share this page

Key Excerpts

  • This strategy [of recusal] is designed to impugn the integrity of the federal judicial system and blame any loss on the decision-maker rather than fallacies in the substantive legal arguments presented.
  • Adjudicating whether an Executive Branch exercise of power is legal, or not, is actually thejob of the federal courts, and not of the President or the Department of Justice.
  • [T]his country has an independent judiciary that adheres to an impartial adjudication process, without being swayed merely because the federal government appears on one side of a case and the President wishes a particular result.
  • [D]efendants’ motion to disqualify this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455, ECF No. 34, which relies only on speculation, innuendo, and basic legal disagreements that provide no basis for disqualification of a judge, must be denied.
Read the filing
Read the filing

Other filings

April 2, 2025

Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts

March 11, 2025

Declaration of Professor Roy D. Simon, Jr. in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order