Fred T. Korematsu Center, SEIU, AFT, AAUP, and Legal Advocacy Organizations Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiff

April 9, 2025

Share this page

Key Excerpts

  • This fundamental principle should control this case: the government violates the First Amendment when it sanctions law firms because it objects to their choices about which causes to take up.
  • The EOs rely on scattershot grievances about the firms’ decisions to take on clients and causes that the President dislikes; they are devoid of specific factual findings of wrongdoing, and therefore the sanctions they impose cannot be tailored to findings of wrongdoing.
  • [T]here is very little on the government’s side of the ledger once one discounts the President’s objections to the firms’ and their clients’ viewpoints—and what remains lacks the specific fact-finding that the Supreme Court has emphasized is necessary to justify an infringement of First Amendment rights.
Read the filing
Read the filing

Other filings

April 2, 2025

Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief

April 2, 2025

Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts

March 11, 2025

Declaration of Professor Roy D. Simon, Jr. in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order